Page 339 - Abstract Book KONIKA 18
P. 339

Neurology

                                              P-NEU-005
             Intraoperative Neurophysiology Monitoring  in Rare Pygopagus Conjoint Twins:
                                            A Case Report

               Anna Tjandrajani1, Citra Raditha , Pandu Caesaria Lestari , Alvi Aulia Rahma , Ahmad Yanuar Safri ,
                                                                      2
                                                        1
                                       1
                                                                                     3
                                     3
                                                      3
                                                                 4
                     Luh Kurnia Indrawati , Winnugroho Wiratman , Samsul Ashari , Affan Priyambodo 4
                                      1
                                                            2
                     Department of Child Health and Department of Neurosurgery , PKIAN RSAB Harapan Kita,
                 Department of Neurology  and Department of Neurosurgery , Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia/
                                 3
                                                       4
                           Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
                                               Abstract
            Background Conjoint twin represent a rare congenital malformation. The separation surgery imposes risk of
            neural injury. Therefore intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (IONM) is indicated to help surgeons to
            be guided and to minimize the impact. Objective To present a case of pygopagus conjoint twins separation
            using IONM as an integral part to the division of both neural and soft tissue stuctures. Case 1-year-old
            girls reffered to our hospital with conjoined twins fused at sacral and perineal, with one anus, two vaginas,
            two urinary meatuses, no sensorymotor deficit. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed fusion at
            sacral, perineal, coccygeus, distal sacrum level spinalis canal, distal medulla spinal, rectal fascia. Paired
            subdermal needle electrodes were placed at head, anterior tibial, gastrocnemius, abductor hallucis muscles
            and recorded for each twin.  Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP)
            were tested to confirm intact sensorimotor function.  A free-run electromyography (EMG) and triggered
            electromyogram (tEMG) was sequentially recorded on each nerve root to distinguish which belonged to either
            one twin. Nerve roots were sequentially stimulated to locate the area of least tEMG activity in both twins
            for identification of save cleavage plane. All nerve roots were subdivided into inboundary nerve fibers and
            seperated sequentially one by one on the boundary where both electromyogram activities were minimized
            until the twins were fully separated. Both twins recovered 0with no neurological deficits of the lower limbs
            Conclusion We encountered a pygopagus conjoint twins separated succesfully using IONM. The use of
            IONM significantly impact surgical decision-making in divison of neurology structures.
                         Keywords: conjoint twins; intraoperative neuromonitoring; separation, surgery

                                              P-NEU-006
                                   Role of Nerve Conduction Study
                  in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Guillain Barre Syndrome: A Case Report

                           Raden Muhammad Indra, Amanda Soebadi, Irawan Mangunatmadja
              Department of Child Health, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Tertiary General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Universitas
                                         Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

                                               Abstract
            Background Nerve conduction study is a sensitive tool to detect nerve lesions in Guillain Barre syndrome
            (GBS). Objective To describe the diagnostic value of nerve conduction study in a case of GBS. Case A 6-year-
            old girl presented with sudden weakness of both lower extremities causing inability to walk three weeks
            before admission.  There were also pain, pruritus, and warm sensations on the left leg and foot.  She was
            diagnosed with acute transverse myelitis (ATM) and was given methylprednisolone with little improvement.
            Muscle strength at presentation was 4444|4444 and 3344|4444 for upper and lower extremities respectively
            with reduced tendon reflexes. A nerve conduction study (NCS) was performed that showed increased distal
            latency, reduced conduction velocity and amplitude on motor and sensory nerves of bilateral median,
            posterior tibial, peroneal nerves. Absence of response was noted on sensory sural nerves, and F waves
            of right median and bilateral tibial nerves. These findings were suggestive of acute motor-sensory axonal
            neuropathy subtype of GBS. Patient was started on intravenous immunoglobulin followed by azathioprine
            and regained full mobility after one month. Conclusion Nerve conduction study in GBS can readily show
            axonal or demyelinating abnormalities even at first days of onset, while upper motor neuron lesions such
            as ATM will not have any apparent abnormalities on routine NCS. Thus, NCS is a valuable diagnostic tool
            to detect nerve lesions in GBS, determine its subtype, and predict prognosis, particularly early after onset
            when distinction between upper and lower motor lesions may not be clear.
                    Keywords: Guillain Barre syndrome; acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy; nerve conduction
                                                 study

                                           KONIKA XVIII Abstract Book                                                                     291
   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344